Talkin’ bout a freeware revolution

Is the open-source movement going to revolutionize the software economy? I believe so, but not the way some idealists paint it.

They behave as if the open-source and free software revolution is the dawn of a new world order in which programmers work entirely for the personal satisfaction of seeing others benefit from their work. In this future utopia, we all freely share our contributions as we tie-dye T-shirts and tiptoe through the daisies in our copious spare time.

The problem with this view is that it implies that money and personal satisfaction are mutually exclusive motives for programming. The worst extremists can make it sound as if anyone who holds a regular job has broken communion with the voodoo spirit of emacs. As propitiation, they have to sacrifice weekends with the family to code open source.

Well, I’ve got a news flash. Money and personal satisfaction aren’t mutually exclusive. Here’s an even bigger shock: All programmers want to get paid for their work. Every single one of them. What distinguishes one type of programmer from another is the currency in which they want to be paid. Some want to be paid in recognition. Others want personal satisfaction. Some even want (gasp) money.

Not even Richard Stallman, the high priest of free software, is immune. He may want all software and documentation to be free, but just try using the term “Linux” around Stallman without putting the free software moniker “GNU” in front of it. Stallman started GNU, and he demands his recognition dollars. And well he should (your position on GNU/Linux notwithstanding).

But here’s the kicker. Regardless of what they really want, most people end up needing the money whether or not they get recognition or satisfaction. Programming is like the fine arts. It is a field filled with grunts, con artists, and truly creative people all with a passion for programming. Almost all of them eventually discover that they have to pay the rent. And that usually means they either have to give up their passion, compromise it for the sake of an employer, pursue it in their spare time, or find a way to get paid real money for it.

Fortunately for some of the best programmers of free software, there is a way to get paid real money for writing open-source and free software. Some of the stars of the Linux programming community are now drawing salaries from vendors like Caldera, Red Hat and SuSE. Sounds like they work for a living, doesn’t it? But these folks should consider themselves extremely lucky. Though the market for open-source talent exists, it is still pretty small.

So if the open-source and free software movement is all about getting a good job, that isn’t much of a new economy, is it? There is one important difference, however. In the new economy, the vendor gives away the fruits of the programmer’s labour. What the vendor charges for is service, support, possibly a book or two, and the convenience of installing the software from a CD.

I’ve heard some people suggest that the CD will become irrelevant when there is enough Internet bandwidth to install a program over the ‘Net as easily as one could install it from a CD.

But if distributors are likely to be threatened by a faster Internet tomorrow, they’re much more likely to be threatened by software pre-loads today. There’s nothing stopping Dell from downloading a copy of Linux or FreeBSD and pre-loading it onto a million computers. But if you want to know the trick to understanding where the money will be made, ask yourself what happens when someone calls Dell for technical support.

Another factor that may contribute to a new economy is the advent of “free for noncommercial use” software. WordPerfect 8 for Linux and Star Office 5.0 for all platforms are free for noncommercial use. Just download’em, register’em and use’em. But once again, free for noncommercial use doesn’t eliminate the need for support, especially in a corporate environment, where there is no such thing as noncommercial use.

So, if the new economy is driven almost entirely by service and support, it would follow that companies will have to focus more on reliability and suitability of their software rather than features and glitz.

Gosh, if that’s the down side, the future is looking pretty darned good.

— IDG News Service

Would you recommend this article?


Thanks for taking the time to let us know what you think of this article!
We'd love to hear your opinion about this or any other story you read in our publication.

Jim Love, Chief Content Officer, IT World Canada

Featured Download

Featured Articles

Empowering the hybrid workforce: how technology can build a better employee experience

Across the country, employees from organizations of all sizes expect flexibility...

What’s behind the best customer experience: How to make it real for your business

The best customer experience – the kind that builds businesses and...

Overcoming the obstacles to optimized operations

Network-driven optimization is a top priority for many Canadian business leaders...

Thriving amid Canada’s tech talent shortage

With today’s tight labour market, rising customer demands, fast-evolving cyber threats...

Staying protected and compliant in an evolving IT landscape

Canadian businesses have changed remarkably and quickly over the last few...

Related Tech News

Tech Jobs

Our experienced team of journalists and bloggers bring you engaging in-depth interviews, videos and content targeted to IT professionals and line-of-business executives.

Tech Companies Hiring Right Now