More than a decade after the inception of shared services – whereby an independent business services group provides human resources, payroll, finance and other support services to business units – many practitioners say they’re still not sure whether it makes sense to bring IT operations under that umbrella.

That’s partly because shared-services groups are supposed to produce cost savings by consolidating disparate support units into a single entity, and it’s not always clear “how much more bang for the buck you get through consolidating the IT organization,” said Stacy Brandom, senior vice-president at J.P. Morgan Chase in New York.

Indeed, shared-services practitioners remain split as to whether it’s in their best interest to include their IT organizations directly in a shared-services outfit or to simply align IT activities with the efforts of the group.

One thing is certain – some organizations that have established shared-services groups have had trouble generating new efficiencies after their initial cost savings. That’s why Swiss Re America Holding Co., an Armonk, N.Y.-based reinsurance company that set up a shared-services group four years ago, folded the infrastructure side of its IT organization into its shared-services group.

Still, for many shared-services practitioners, the role of the IT organizations remains a constant sticking point. “If you centralize operations too much, you give up too much control,” said Nathan E. Cagle, vice-president of human resources at Union, N.J.-based NUI Corp.

Would you recommend this article?

0
0
Thanks for taking the time to let us know what you think of this article!
We'd love to hear your opinion about this or any other story you read in our publication. Click this link to send me a note →

Jim Love, Chief Content Officer, IT World Canada