Fixes for your under-performing staff

So how do you find, fix or fire your poor performers? CIO magazine in the U.S. raised this issue and fielded a number of related questions submitted by readers online. For the answers, it turned to Dick Grote, president of Grote Consulting Inc., a management consultancy specializing in performance appraisal. Here’s a sample of the questions asked, and what Mr. Grote answered.

Q: Are there approaches to get people to face the reality that they are not as good as they think they are?

A: Remember this: it’s your opinion that counts, not theirs. You’re the boss. The purpose of the conversation about their performance (or lack of it) is not to get their agreement. They’ll never agree. The purpose is to get their understanding. The best way is to state your opinion bluntly: “I’ve got some bad news for you, Sam. I’ve been reviewing your performance and, quite frankly, it isn’t very good. Let’s talk about what you need to do if you want to keep your job.” That’s a perfect opening.

Q: Management thinks that in the best interest of the team, all members – in spite of their performance levels – should get equal opportunities. But as a worker, lack of managerial recognition kills my morale.

A: What you’ve described is one of the primary manifestations of managerial cowardice – the belief that a manager should treat everyone the same. Those who benefit from this treatment are the weeds of the organization’s garden, and when they discover that their manager isn’t going to do any more for the best performers than for the worst, they get on the phone and call all their weedy little friends to come down to the employment office. The primary job of management is to discriminate, not based on race or age or sex, but on performance. Good managers play favorites; they heap rewards on those who get the job done.

Q: Within a forced-ranking system, how do you compare contributions of a DBA, developer and network administrator? Their roles are different, but they must be treated as IT employees when it comes to ranking.

A: Make sure that the criteria you’ve chosen for your forced-ranking system cover more than just how well they do the various tasks listed in their job descriptions. Is teamwork important to your company? Make sure you use that as a criterion. Is having a positive attitude a competency you value? Put that among your forced-ranking criteria. Too often, organizations put up with insolence and attitude because the person has terrific technical skills. Forced-ranking systems can help you spot and remove those who cover their technical tracks but make life miserable for those around them.

Would you recommend this article?


Thanks for taking the time to let us know what you think of this article!
We'd love to hear your opinion about this or any other story you read in our publication.

Jim Love, Chief Content Officer, IT World Canada

Featured Download

Featured Articles

Empowering the hybrid workforce: how technology can build a better employee experience

Across the country, employees from organizations of all sizes expect flexibility...

What’s behind the best customer experience: How to make it real for your business

The best customer experience – the kind that builds businesses and...

Overcoming the obstacles to optimized operations

Network-driven optimization is a top priority for many Canadian business leaders...

Thriving amid Canada’s tech talent shortage

With today’s tight labour market, rising customer demands, fast-evolving cyber threats...

Staying protected and compliant in an evolving IT landscape

Canadian businesses have changed remarkably and quickly over the last few...

Related Tech News

Tech Jobs

Our experienced team of journalists and bloggers bring you engaging in-depth interviews, videos and content targeted to IT professionals and line-of-business executives.

Tech Companies Hiring Right Now