Web services enticing but somewhat confusing to IT pros

Network executives are having problems distinguishing the differences between Web services vendors and the products they offer, but a majority of IT professionals are starting to deploy or test the technology, according to a recent survey.

Hurwitz Group Inc. found in its Web Services Primary Research Opportunity Study, in which it polled 300 IT professionals, that 45 per cent of companies are implementing Web services, while another 36 per cent are testing the technology. Those respondents also said they expect to see measurable improvements over the next 6 to 12 months in their computing environments based on their investments in Web services.

The results also show that 47 per cent are using Web services for internal integration projects and 25 per cent for external integration projects.

The survey also found that many network executives are willing to buy best-of-breed products as opposed to purchasing the software from their traditional vendors. Only 8 per cent said they would confine their purchasing to the vendors they currently do business with, and 14 per cent said they would buy a turnkey Web services platform from a single vendor.

“It is pretty interesting how companies are willing to go with best-of-breed tools,” says Tyler McDaniel, director of software strategies for Hurwitz. “During economic downturns, enterprises rely on stable, big vendors, but in this case they are going with best-of-breed vendors.” McDaniel says that speaks well of products from vendors such as BEA Systems Inc., Cape Clear Software Inc., Borland Software Corp., Infravio Inc. and Systinet Corp.

The survey also revealed that security was the No. 1 inhibitor to Web services adoption. “The adoption of Web services development tools is quicker than we thought,” says McDaniel. But he says that as applications are developed network executives quickly realize that they are missing mechanisms and protocols to handle security, reliability and quality of service. Respondents also cited quality assurance tools, and performance and system management software as adoption inhibitors.

The biggest drivers for adoption were the ability to use IT resources more effectively and to better integrate their company’s business processes.

In terms of platform, the survey found that Microsoft Corp.’s .Net and Java are running neck and neck. The results show IBM Corp. is the dominant vendor in the Java space, but that Oracle Corp. has a strong presence with its 9i database and application server.

The survey also revealed that 59 per cent of respondents are purchasing their Web services software directly from vendors.

“The channel is being left out,” McDaniel says. “It is incumbent on systems integrators to incorporate these Web services into their business services.”

Would you recommend this article?


Thanks for taking the time to let us know what you think of this article!
We'd love to hear your opinion about this or any other story you read in our publication.

Jim Love, Chief Content Officer, IT World Canada

Featured Download

Featured Articles

Empowering the hybrid workforce: how technology can build a better employee experience

Across the country, employees from organizations of all sizes expect flexibility...

What’s behind the best customer experience: How to make it real for your business

The best customer experience – the kind that builds businesses and...

Overcoming the obstacles to optimized operations

Network-driven optimization is a top priority for many Canadian business leaders...

Thriving amid Canada’s tech talent shortage

With today’s tight labour market, rising customer demands, fast-evolving cyber threats...

Staying protected and compliant in an evolving IT landscape

Canadian businesses have changed remarkably and quickly over the last few...

Related Tech News

Tech Jobs

Our experienced team of journalists and bloggers bring you engaging in-depth interviews, videos and content targeted to IT professionals and line-of-business executives.

Tech Companies Hiring Right Now