Internet access tax ban nears vote

As the clock ticks toward Saturday’s expiration of the federal ban on Internet access taxes, lawmakers are angling to keep the moratorium, while cash-strapped states aim to make sure it doesn’t cost them billions of tax dollars.

A bill making the moratorium permanent cleared the House in September and might make it to a Senate floor vote this week. A lingering key question: What constitutes Internet access, and what telecommunications services does such access include, if any. A number of senators have blocked action on the bill, HR 49, until the matter is clarified.

Double Breaks?

If passed, the bill would make permanent the current five-year moratorium on taxing Internet access. It would prohibit state and local jurisdictions from imposing new taxes on Internet access, either dial-up or broadband. The moratorium also would ban states from taxing online and offline purchases differently, such as imposing multiple taxes on an online purchase.

But the biggest sticking point is the definition of telecommunications services, which opponents call overly broad and ambiguous.

“Let’s not be so vague. We could be permanently exempting telecommunications taxes that some states are now collecting,” says Christine Lapille, a spokesperson for the National Governors’ Association.

Others are concerned that services now taxed, such as phone service, could escape taxation in the future by being bundled with nontaxable Internet access.

The bill’s language already makes clear that when a provider bundles taxable and nontaxable services, the entire package is taxable, says Mark Mullet, Verizon Communications Inc. vice president of government relations.

“States and localities are blowing this up,” Mullet says. “They’re saying telephone companies are never paying another penny in tax again. That’s just not true.”


Nevertheless, according to the Multistate Tax Commission, states would lose between US$4 billion and $9 billion in 2006 under the bill’s provisions.

These numbers seem exaggerated, says Mike DiConti, director of the Business Roundtable, an industry group of the largest 150 American companies. Because technologies are so fluid today, lawmakers shouldn’t be overly restrictive in their language, DiConti adds. “Not all contingencies can be written in today,” he says. Sen. George Allen (R-Virginia), a cosponsor of the moratorium bill, is “working with senators on an individual basis on issues that they may have concerning the bill,” according to Mike Waldron, an Allen spokesperson. Supporters say the bill has majority support in the Senate and should pass if it comes to a floor vote this week.

“This is not a partisan issue,” says John Berthoud, president of the National Taxpayers Union. “If this comes to a vote, I think it’s going to pass.”

Would you recommend this article?


Thanks for taking the time to let us know what you think of this article!
We'd love to hear your opinion about this or any other story you read in our publication.

Jim Love, Chief Content Officer, IT World Canada

Featured Download

Featured Articles

Empowering the hybrid workforce: how technology can build a better employee experience

Across the country, employees from organizations of all sizes expect flexibility...

What’s behind the best customer experience: How to make it real for your business

The best customer experience – the kind that builds businesses and...

Overcoming the obstacles to optimized operations

Network-driven optimization is a top priority for many Canadian business leaders...

Thriving amid Canada’s tech talent shortage

With today’s tight labour market, rising customer demands, fast-evolving cyber threats...

Staying protected and compliant in an evolving IT landscape

Canadian businesses have changed remarkably and quickly over the last few...

Related Tech News

Tech Jobs

Our experienced team of journalists and bloggers bring you engaging in-depth interviews, videos and content targeted to IT professionals and line-of-business executives.

Tech Companies Hiring Right Now