Cutting through the Service Pack noise

A few days before this writing, Microsoft released its Service Pack 2 for Windows XP to manufacturing, meaning you’ll see it in about a month or two.

It’s one so widely encompassing that one analyst calls it more akin to a full Windows upgrade. It’s also largely security-focused, containing changes to default security settings and a new patch management system, among other fixes. And it came only two days late. All things considered, the process went well. So why does Microsoft find itself at the centre of yet another controversy?

Because in being so diligent in working around security issues, Microsoft has made some concessions, namely around compatibility. So it’s urging IT departments to test the update before rolling it out. Users of Microsoft CRM 1.2 software, for instance, are being asked to download a patch before installing SP2, as the two have been found not to mix.

Surely of bigger concern to Redmond is the reaction of IBM, home to 400,000 Windows desktops. In an internal memo leaked to our affiliate, IDG News Service, officials ordered employees not to download SP2.

“IBM’s large number of Web applications will need to be tested and some modified to work correctly with SP2,” IBM tells its employees in the note. “When the current issues and concerns have been addressed, IBM will deploy a customized version of SP2.”

And, just in case this seemed over simple, Microsoft is also updating its Windows Update Service to accommodate interruptions because, for most users, the download will be between 80MB and 100MB in size, according to Microsoft.

None of this is getting in the way of Microsoft’s advice, which is for XP users to install SP2 as soon as they can.

Put aside the fact that only about 14 per cent of the computing world uses XP. When it comes to this patch, Microsoft is right.

Two issues have plagued Microsoft for years, and for good reason — security and reliability. Windows 2003 and XP helped alleviate the latter, and now Microsoft is working on the former. What’s more, the user community has been calling on Redmond to make security fixes. To say there’s a long way to go is an understatement, but the patch is a welcome addition to the security arsenal.

The only failure here is one of communication — Microsoft should have and must be upfront about the need for SP2, and be frank about the concessions it had to make in order to release it. In theory, developers can work forever on patch. In practice, Microsoft weighed the pros and cons and acted. Now we should do the same.

Would you recommend this article?


Thanks for taking the time to let us know what you think of this article!
We'd love to hear your opinion about this or any other story you read in our publication.

Jim Love, Chief Content Officer, IT World Canada

Featured Download

Featured Articles

Empowering the hybrid workforce: how technology can build a better employee experience

Across the country, employees from organizations of all sizes expect flexibility...

What’s behind the best customer experience: How to make it real for your business

The best customer experience – the kind that builds businesses and...

Overcoming the obstacles to optimized operations

Network-driven optimization is a top priority for many Canadian business leaders...

Thriving amid Canada’s tech talent shortage

With today’s tight labour market, rising customer demands, fast-evolving cyber threats...

Staying protected and compliant in an evolving IT landscape

Canadian businesses have changed remarkably and quickly over the last few...

Related Tech News

Tech Jobs

Our experienced team of journalists and bloggers bring you engaging in-depth interviews, videos and content targeted to IT professionals and line-of-business executives.

Tech Companies Hiring Right Now