Japan FTC: Microsoft violating Antimonopoly Act

The Japan Fair Trade Commission (JFTC) said Tuesday that certain provisions in license agreements between Microsoft Corp. and Japanese PC vendors violate Japan’s antimonopoly code.

The JFTC said that the provisions under question restrict possible legal action should licensees believe Microsoft is infringing on their patents. The JFTC decided such a provision unjustly restricts the business activities of the licensees and thus violates section 19 of the Antimonopoly Act, it said.

In a 13-page recommendation, it detailed the basis for its finding and issued a recommendation that the provisions be terminated in both current and previous agreements. Apart from its recommendations, the JFTC did not spell out any potential fines that may be imposed on Microsoft for violating JFTC rules.

Microsoft had been given until July 26 to either accept or reject the JFTC recommendation, although the software maker said Tuesday it plans to reject the finding, according to Aki Araki, a spokeswoman for Microsoft’s Japan unit.

“We respectfully disagree with the conclusions reached by the JFTC at this stage of the process, and will avail ourselves of the mechanism set out in the law and regulations to seek a review of this decision,” the company said in a statement.

“We look forward to explaining the operation of this provision in more detail during the next stage of this process before the JFTC.”

“We believe that the provision at issue fairly balances IP protection and the need to create a stable environment for the development of the IT industry by avoiding disruptive IP disputes,” the statement said. “The industry and consumers have benefited from this stability, and IP owners have always been empowered to raise and exercise their rights in a reasonable manner.”

Because the recommendation concerns Microsoft in the U.S. and not the Japanese unit, the rejection won’t be made until appropriate consultation has taken place between both sides, Araki said.

The JFTC expects to receive the rejection around the July 26 deadline after which a hearing process will begin that is likely to take between two and three years to complete, said Takujiro Kono, deputy director of the JFTC’s First Special Investigation Division.

“Normally, we issue an announcement about the commencement of hearings about one month after receiving the rejection,” Kono said. “Another month later the first hearing takes place in the JTFC.”

Such a schedule would put the first hearing around the end of September or beginning of October.

The hearing, which Kono likened to a court hearing, will see Microsoft lawyers and experts, along with their counterparts from the JFTC, submit arguments and supporting documents to a hearing examiner, he said. Regular hearings will likely take place at intervals of around one month as part of the process, which usually takes at least one year to complete and averages two or three years, he said.

Tuesday’s ruling follows a raid of Microsoft’s Japan headquarters in February by the JFTC.

Microsoft has come under much more stringent scrutiny from other countries for anticompetitive business practices.

The Redmond, Washington, company is currently appealing a ruling by the European Union’s executive branch that it violated competition law through the use of its dominance in the PC operating system market to gain advantage in the markets for work group server operating systems and media players. The Commission imposed a fine of

Related Download
Improving the State of Affairs With Analytics Sponsor: SAS
Improving the State of Affairs With Analytics
Download this case study-rich white paper to learn why data management and analytics are so crucial in the public sector, and how to put it to work in your organization.
Register Now