SHARE
Follow this article on Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Bookmark and Share
Home >> Leadership >> Industry News

Robots will replace all workers in 25 years: Futurist

Robots will replace all workers in 25 years: Futurist

By:  Howard Solomon  On: 10 Feb 2010 For: Network World Canada Creator

When you look at emerging technologies, as a Cisco Systems official does, you see a lot of whiz-bang things: Intelligent robots, networks that move at light speed and billions of devices connected to the Internet. An industry analyst says there's a lot of dreaming. But, he adds, why not?

What will the future of computing bring?

If you believe Cisco Systems Inc. futurist Dave Evan, in five years we’ll be creating the equivalent of 92 million Libraries of Congress worth of data a year, in 20 years artificial brain implants will be available and in 25 years robots will replace all workers.

Small wonder Evans told a group of Canadian reporters and IT analysts Wednesday that what he calls the coming technology avalanche “will be incredibly destructive” to some.

“It behooves those organizations and individuals and governments to really get this and embrace this,” he warned. “This is a fundamental shift in how we as a species will operate forward.”

Evans, whose job is to look at emerging and advanced technologies for Cisco’s consulting arm, said the predictions are based on a number of assumptions, including the pace of change we’ve seen recently accelerating over the next 30 years.

“Things are no longer growing at a linear rate,” he argues. "Because of the law of large numbers things are accelerating at an exponential rate.”

Not surprisingly, perhaps, considering the way organizations and individuals are reluctant to purge their hard drives, Evans foresees the world’s data will increase six times in each of the next two years – including corporate data multiplying 50 times a year. So by 2029 we’ll pay a mere US$100 for 11 petabytes of storage.

We’ll want to push that data around, so by 2013, wireless network traffic will reach 400 petabytes a month, compared to the 9 PB a month that flow today through both wired and wireless networks.

Moore’s Law, the dictum that the number of transistors that can be put on an integrated circuit will double roughly every 18 months, will be extended “for some time,” despite fears that the limits of reducing silicon will be reached soon. It will – around 2021.

By then, a breakthrough in quantum computing will make “mindblowingly fast” computers that will allow instantaneous language translation and machines that recognize faces, that think and networks that can transmit an unlimited amount of data any distance.

Each of us may have a virtual assistant – a digital creation with feelings – taking over the drudgery of online tasks like going through our inboxes and monitoring e-Bay auctions.

Or, he added, because “data does not equal knowledge,” intelligent machines will be put to use mining those mountains of digital files, videos and music we’ll be storing to help us make smart decisions about our lives.

“There’s enough problems now to keep us busy for a millennium,” he said at one point, “whether it’s global climate change, resource depletion, Africa, AIDs, disease, you name it.”


Sign up for our Newsletters












Print |  Views: 12930   |   Rating:ononononoff  (3 votes)
Rate this article on a scale of
1 to 5 stars,5 being the best.




Howard Solomon Howard Solomon Howard Solomon is assistant editor of Network World Canada covering network infrastructure and communications issues. An IT journalist  since 1997, he has written for several of IT... more

Comments (8)

stefan ianta
by stefan ianta 2/12/2010 9:54:44 PM

I think the technology trends fueled by our own unstoppable urge to make a difference and improve things around us, will bring us to that exponential growth in info processing.

But I think there are two critical turning points which have to be added to the picture and it is easier to depict the more distant one, which might be beyond those 25 years.

It will be the point when digital information processing technology will reach similar performance to the biochemical info processing of the human brain. The implication of this is that those AI systems, by definition (Turing test), will be able to display a human behavior, which has to be base on some human profile. That profile could be yours or whomever interested to pay for the system. If you double this by the ability to learn on his/her own and then you get the definition of digital life. Thus, people will be able to extend and/or multiply and parallel their lives (if they afford the cost).

So, to a large extent those robots replacing humans might very well be the esouls of some existing or past human workers. They will be our alter egos working for us and if we would have enough imagination, curiosity, will and funds to have them maintained on the technology waves beyond the life span of the human body they could embody someones spirit indefinitely. There is a lot more to imagine there, but hope you got the idea and see that time more brighter, although some conflict will continue to exists as always.

That will be the time when everyone will want and pay for some form of digital avatar for himself and loved ones the same way we buy today cars computers or a remarkable grave.

The second point will be sometime in the next two decades when people will realize that they can save and archive their souls for a future re-animation.

In the end immaterial means informational and the nature of soul is informational.

More thoughts on this line at esouls.info

christine newlon
by christine newlon 2/17/2010 7:24:04 PM

If we are all unemployed, who will buy the robots?

manuel fernandez
by manuel fernandez 2/22/2010 10:48:19 AM

the answer is around you don't have to buy or paid for anything since the cost of products won't be the same, energy i don't know ,perhaps some form of communism arise

Michael Flynn
by Michael Flynn 2/22/2010 12:00:01 PM

The recently released movie called "Surrogates" starring Bruce Willis portrays an interesting view on the concept.

If tapping into brain waves (how it works in Surrogates) ever becomes possible then Evens is likely right, otherwise multiple that 25 years by 4 and I would probably believe it.

Unfortunately greed slows progress and thus evolution. Until we really live in a free world "human resources" will always remain the cheapest.

Ron Arthur
by Ron Arthur 2/22/2010 1:14:57 PM

This is facinating stuff. I have been following these kinds of futuristic trends for some time. One of the best articles written on the subject came from Bill Joy, one of the founders of Sun. It's titled "Why the Future doesn't need us" (Google it, its a facinating read)

Also there have been discussions around the timeframe for when computers will be able to think called Singularity. There's events and an association built around this as well. Humanity faces a great challenge, but also a great opportunity.

don thompson
by don thompson 2/22/2010 1:20:29 PM

First, I have a nice children's book from the 1950's that says all this should already be done. There would be no need to work - robots will do it all.

Second there will be no "no work riots" if there is no need to work. The only reason people get upset about unemployment is the need for currency to enable such mundane things as eating.

Third, Michael is completely correct: "greed slows progress".

kees schuur
by kees schuur 2/23/2010 3:45:16 AM

Up to now people could cope with change, because information was treated (developed, sold, protected, quality assurance) as an industrial product. In fact, the information age never existed, but was created in the mind of people to make the product 'information' more important than the other products.

The ever increasing speed of change asks for a different mindset. The paradigma shift, and with this the mental model shift, that takes place is towards the network society / economy, in which the product information has barely a value, and the focus is more on the proces behind it. Eveerywhere cracks are visible, like in the importance of universities (dedicated centres of knowledge excellence), the copyright (protecting) issue, Education (towards lifelong learning/developling).

For the human being the way to deal with this new mind set is to focus more on communicating self-steering and where the developing of a person, valueing of each other andf network-cooperation would be more important.

It might turn out towards a lively, harmoneous world (Aquarius)......?

Interesting thought might be how schools (learning) and university (knowledge deelopment) would look like in 2020 / 2035.

I have some ideas.....

andre scantland
by andre scantland 2/23/2010 2:08:55 PM

When I was a kid, I was told that cars would fly by 1990. We are far, very far from this reality as it will be the same with «mobile» robots. Robots exists in manufacturing but are programmed to do specific things.

Smart robots or self guided robots with artificial intelligence will not be available for another 100 years, at least, and robots with human behavior and concientiousness will not be available for another 200 to 500 years.

We dont entirely understand the human brain mechanims let alone replace people by machines. Those realities are available only in CGI sci-fi films.

Sorry to burst the bubble of those who thinks that robots may replace human and act like humans one day.

Name: (required) eMail: (optional)

Your email address will not appear online and will be used only if the editor wishes to contact you personally for additional comments.