SHARE
Follow this article on Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Bookmark and Share
Home >> Leadership >> Value Management and ROI

OPINION: The urge to verb up

OPINION: The urge to verb up

By:  Dave Webb  On: 01 Jul 2009 For: ComputerWorld Canada Creator

Especially in the Web search market, companies are recognizing that success is about sharing, not guarding, the brand

When I grow up, I want to be a verb.

When Microsoft Corp. recently launched the most recent evolution of its Web search project, the name drew mixed reviews. “Bing” was an odd choice. (One blogger wondered why Microsoft had named its search engine after the most passive-aggressive character on the sitcom Friends.)

One of the prominent rationales for the choice, according to Microsoft head honcho Steve Ballmer, was the name’s potential to “verb up.”

The trend toward brands becoming verbs is a recent one, and it’s been largely confined to the search space. In fact, it’s pretty much become a necessity for any kind of market share in search. Have you ever AltaVista’d anything? Of course not. You Googled it. And that’s why Google is king and for most of us AltaVista is a vague memory.

Do you Yahoo? Sure you do. (Read that one aloud; it’s fun.)

Will you be Binging something in the near future? Time will tell.

This is a break with branding tradition. In the old days, once a year, every newsroom would receive a letter on behalf of the legal department of some company whose product risked becoming a generic: “When referencing in print, remember that Kleenex® is capitalized and should be followed by the registered trademark symbol,” or words to that effect. Fridgidaire and Aspirin also sent periodic reminders. It must have cost a fortune in postage.

The reason was this: Legally, a company must be able to show evidence that it is aggressively protecting its brand from other uses, or it risks losing it and allowing the brand to become a generic.

In tech, Xerox Corp. fought an uphill battle against the generic. Photocopies were long referred to as Xeroxes. (Brand protection seems to be built into my word processor; it won’t let me start the word with a lower-case “x,” auto-correcting to the capital.) And interestingly, it’s one of the first examples of a brand becoming a verb.

Why is it so prevalent in the search arena? At risk of overstating the obvious, search, like photocopying, is active, not passive. You get up and Xerox something. When you need to know, you Google it. We can PhotoShop a picture. But then, why don’t we Word a document or Outlook a message?

It’s something to consider, especially relevant as Ottawa will begin to debate (again) changes to the Copyright Act to bring it into line with the realities of the “digital millennium.” Successful branding has become about sharing the brand, whereas it used to be about guarding it. It’s collaborative marketing, with users becoming the oft-unwitting collaborator. Companies that understand that will win. Companies that don’t? Well, here’s the Kleenex®.


Sign up for our Newsletters












Print |  Views: 783   |   Rating:offoffoffoffoff  (0 votes)
Rate this article on a scale of
1 to 5 stars,5 being the best.




Dave Webb Dave Webb Dave Webb is a journalist of 20 years experience in newspapers and magazines. He has followed technology exclusively since 1998 and was the winner of the Andersen Consulting Award for Excell... more

Related Content

Blogosphere: Can we count on Google in 2018?
Blogosphere: Can we count on Google in 2018?The company has come a long way in the first decade of its existence, but bloggers such as Om Malik, Nicholas Carr and others wonder what the future holds, and how history might have unfolded differently
Microsoft girds for Google battle
Microsoft girds for Google battleRedmond looks to be the other big player in the online search and advertising world
Google asks court to enforce Vista Search changes
Google asks court to enforce Vista Search changesIt's called a "friend of the court" brief, but the search engine giant was making no friends in Redmond by requesting a judge to oversee Microsoft's compliance with an antitrust deal it struck last week
Trying to Throw the Brick through the Cloud – Microsoft/Yahoo vs. Google
there has been much press and discussion about the potential merger between microsoft and yahoo (the brick) in an attempt to become a formidable force against google (the cloud).  yahoo management does not want to be taken over and they have recommended rejection of the offer, turning this into a potential hostile takeover.  the hostile takeover of y
MS/Yahoo versus Google
a microsoft/yahoo marriage? there's something to contemplate ...from a microsoft perspective, this really is all about google. microsoft's windows live ecosystem, positioned as a google-killer, simply hasn't gained the traction redmond wo
What's in store for Google's GDrive
whatever google offers with the gdrive – assuming it ever actually comes out with the gdrive – it’s got to be better than having

Comments (0)

No Comments!
Name: (required) eMail: (optional)

Your email address will not appear online and will be used only if the editor wishes to contact you personally for additional comments.