SHARE
Follow this article on Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Bookmark and Share
Home >> Government

No mandatory census means no data quality

No mandatory census means no data quality

By:  Kathleen Lau  On: 27 Jul 2010 For: ComputerWorld Canada Creator

A Toronto-based veteran demographer said Industry Minister Tony Clement's decision to scrap the mandatory long-form census means data samples will be skewed and reliability of information collected will be zero. An IDC Canada analyst weighs in on privacy complaints

The Federal government’s recent decision to replace the mandatory long-form census with a voluntary household survey has serious implications on the quality of collected data that public and private sector organizations rely on, warns a veteran demographer with Pitney Bowes Business Insight.

The data collected through the mandatory long-form census has been invaluable in a variety of ways including to government agencies in creating new policy and with businesses to understand things like growth trends, said Toronto-based Tom Exter.
 
“Making that long-form voluntary really distorts the samples because the number of people goes down, and there is an unknown bias,” said Exter, who expresses his disagreement in a blog.
 
In June, Industry Minister Tony Clement announced he would stop the mandatory long-form census for 2011, citing privacy concerns given some questions were considered intrusive. In its place will be a voluntary National Household Survey. Meanwhile, the short-form census will continue to be compulsory and include basic questions such as the number of people residing in a home and their gender.
Nominate someone you work with for a ComputerWorld Canada IT Leadership Award

A census that is mandatory provides a sample that is a “reasonable set of information” about a particular neighbourhood given it’s based on data collected from one in every five households, explains Exter.

Pitney Bowes Business Insight, itself, provides market intelligence to customers based on census data and other data sources. “Not having that (data) will have a huge impact on local governments, planning agencies, small businesses, and all industries of people who use that,” said Exter.

Asking citizens to voluntary fill out the census introduces a bias into the data making it no longer valuable, said Alison Brooks, director of public sector research with Toronto-based IDC Canada Ltd.

"You have a proclivity to answer the survey depending on whether you are keen on the government or not,” said Brooks.

Data management and quality is an area of increasing concern in government, further compounded by the fact that information is proliferating, said Brooks.

Private and public sector organizations that rely on such data sources in their business operations are worried, noted Brooks.

The Conservative government has said it will send out the voluntary survey to 60 per cent more households to compensate for the fact that it’s no longer mandatory. But Brooks doesn’t agree that approach will help, the “implications of which will only be discovered down the road.”


Sign up for our Newsletters












Print |  Views: 2823   |   Rating:onoffoffoffoff  (1 votes)
Rate this article on a scale of
1 to 5 stars,5 being the best.




Kathleen Lau Kathleen Lau was a senior writer with ITWorldCanada.com and ComputerWorld Canada from December 2006 to August 2011.In her role as senior writer, she covered broadly technology news and issues r... more

Comments (4)

Josey Asprey
by Josey Asprey 7/28/2010 11:41:01 AM

I for one could care less for the "Long Cocensus". I look at it as an invasion of my privacy. The government already has my birth date, where I was born, my mother's name, my UIC number, my Health Card number, my driver's licence number, where I bought my car, where I live and how much money I get for my pension. Any other information is not need for these people who purchase that info.. (Which I deem as an invasion into my Privacy) so to h*** with those people who wish to interfere in my private life.

F W
by F W 7/28/2010 1:13:32 PM

As a systems analyst, data analyst, database architect and instructor in all those fields, I feel that we have finally crossed the line here. I have always maintained that bad data is worse than no data at all, because with no data, you will often make bad decisions, but with bad data the result is always bad decisions. Any business that has tried to ignore real financial information in favour of strictly political considerations will validate that.

At least there's a huge upside here, though. If nothing trustworthy is going to come out of StatsCan now, it can be closed and return millions to the economy. One Ouija board in each corporate boardroom, social agency, and small business should suffice.

YB in Winnipeg
by YB in Winnipeg 7/29/2010 10:40:41 AM

Most people do not like filling out the long form, but it is essential to maintaining the integrity of the information compiled. As demography in this great country changes over time, it is critical that government & industry have reliable data. It apparently works because most countries in the world envy Canada. We do some things exceptionally well. The banks wanted to merge and grow, craved less regulation, but because government at that time insisted on maintaining our good regulatory systems, we did not suffer the misfortunes of the US and other countries. Harper needs to rethink this one. "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."

John B
by John B 7/29/2010 8:06:09 PM

As long as Stats Canada continues to have a Canadian division of an American company process our statitics data, there will always be a chance the USA will use the Patriot Act to access data on Canadians.

that is why I refused to answer certain questions on the long census form last time and that is what i told the Stats Canada worker that called me.

It is unacceptable for Canada not to process it by a 100 % canadian company.

Name: (required) eMail: (optional)

Your email address will not appear online and will be used only if the editor wishes to contact you personally for additional comments.