SHARE
Follow this article on Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Bookmark and Share
Home >> Government

IISD/ICF study zero-carbon strategy for Canadian research institutions

IISD/ICF study zero-carbon strategy for Canadian research institutions

By:  Jennifer Kavur  On: 18 Dec 2009 For: ComputerWorld Canada Creator

A study launching in January aims to quantify carbon emmissions from the Canadian university research institutes

The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) and ICF International are embarking on a study in January that aims to quantify carbon emissions at three Canadian research institutions in an effort to develop a business case for moving IT operations to zero-carbon facilities.

A final report on the CANARIE-funded study, which includes participation by the University of Alberta, the University of Ottawa and Dalhousie University, is scheduled for release by the summer of 2010.

The study partners specifically with three universities, but the output “could potentially be used by any research organization in Canada to asses whether the business case fits their operational model or not,” said Tony Vetter, project manager for Global Connectivity at Ottawa-based IISD.

The study will focus on three main areas: determining how much carbon emission is released from IT facilities at Canadian research institutions, developing a business case for relocating IT operations to zero-carbon facilities and examining policy and jurisdictional barriers to such relocation projects.

While studies analyzing the carbon footprint of IT facilities at research institutions based in the U.S. and the U.K. are readily available, concrete figures for Canadian organizations are nearly non-existent, Vetter explained.  

“This will be a ground-breaking study in the sense that it will be establishing some concrete figures regarding what the order of magnitude is for these institutions in terms of their carbon footprint resulting from IT infrastructure,” he said.

IT infrastructure accounts for a large portion of equivalent CO2 emissions at research universities, according to IISD, which highlights an estimate from the California Institute for Telecommunications and Information Technology indicating higher education is responsible for five to 10 per cent of carbon emissions in the U.S.

“IISD’s study will look at whether the estimates are similar in Canada,” states IISD.

The business case will target projects that relocate a portion of all of those IT facilities to a zero-carbon site powered by a renewable source of energy, such as a waterfall or a windmill, which would then leverage CANARIE’s high-speed network to connect the off-site location to the research institution, explained Vetter.

CANARIE’s ultra high-speed network could potentially connect populated centres with remote locations, which would tackle the traditional difficulty associated with relocation projects that rely on renewable energy sources located in areas that are difficult to access, he pointed out.

“You’re typically looking at developing a power generation facility that needs to transmit that energy over hundreds or thousands of kilometres … the transmission of that energy will suffer losses in the process,” he said.


Sign up for our Newsletters












Print |  Views: 1793   |   Rating:offoffoffoffoff  (0 votes)
Rate this article on a scale of
1 to 5 stars,5 being the best.




Jennifer Kavur Jennifer Kavur Jennifer Kavur was a senior writer for ComputerWorld Canada from 2008 to 2010.

Comments (1)

david grant
by david grant 12/21/2009 3:46:35 PM

The rules governing this study were obviously written to make these places look 'good'. The business of such a research institute obviously includes travel to and from 'work' by all employees and contributors, and all business travel, including conferences and related presentations. It takes a lot of carbon to get a team of researchers to Europe or the Orient. It also includes all the GHG generated by the work itself, like getting teams to remote areas, ... and keeping the team in the field. The lights and heat in the base office are a tiny fraction of the cost of operation of some research institutes. Remember also that planting a tree just locks up the carbon for a few decades longer than the plants that would grow in that place if no tree was planted.

Will we get a study of the real GHG consequences of such an entity? Will we spend money and time making a fictional account instead?

Name: (required) eMail: (optional)

Your email address will not appear online and will be used only if the editor wishes to contact you personally for additional comments.