SHARE
Follow this article on Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Bookmark and Share
Home >> Enterprise Infrastructure

IBM splits memory and processor on eX5 servers

IBM splits memory and processor on eX5 servers

By:  Jennifer Kavur  On: 04 Mar 2010 For: ComputerWorld Canada Creator

Big Blue says its new line of x86 servers eliminate the memory bottleneck with expandability up to 1.5TB. Analysts discuss the value of purpose-built architecture in a virtual environment

IBM’s solution is “a real cost-saver for a lot of companies,” said Darin Stahl, lead analyst at London, Ont.-based Info-Tech Research Group Ltd. Extreme memory allows companies to dramatically increase the number of virtual servers for the same licence costs, he said.

But the response from hardware vendors to design purpose-built platforms and architecture that support virtualization is not breakthrough, Stahl said. Hewlett-Packard Co. announced a version of its products very similar to IBM’s last June, he said.

“You could certainly make the case that (this) is a response to what HP did with their Extreme Scale-out architecture,” said Stahl, who expects similar announcements from other OEMs like Dell Inc. down the road.

Purpose-built infrastructure will be a “much more welcome play for mid-sized enterprises” than blades have been, according to Stahl.

Some would argue that the blade architecture is already purpose-built and useful for virtualization, but the majority of Info-Tech clients “who are really deep in virtualization” have not adopted the blade architecture, he said.

Blade architecture “locks you into sort of a commodity architecture that could be very expensive, so the adoption rate on blades has been very low, whereas this form factor that is purpose-built tends to bring lower (capital expenditure),” he said.

“Virtualization has been the engine behind data centre transformation over the last few years,” said Tarun Bhasin, server market analyst at IDC Canada, in an e-mail interview.

“These new products from IBM will help continue and even accelerate the trend towards greater virtual machine density per box … Moreover, it paves the way for more (virtualization) use cases such as server-hosted desktops,” said Bhasin.

The plus for IT departments is they “can do more with less,” said Bhasin. “But the downside is having to manage VM sprawl.” 

Follow me on Twitter @jenniferkavur 









Sign up for our Newsletters












Print |  Views: 4530   |   Rating:ononononoff  (1 votes)
Rate this article on a scale of
1 to 5 stars,5 being the best.




Jennifer Kavur Jennifer Kavur Jennifer Kavur was a senior writer for ComputerWorld Canada from 2008 to 2010.
blog comments powered by Disqus