SHARE
Follow this article on Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Bookmark and Share
Home >> Enterprise Infrastructure >> Servers and Mainframes

IBM responds to economic woes with virtualization

IBM responds to economic woes with virtualization

By:  Rafael Ruffolo  On: 12 Nov 2008 For: ComputerWorld Canada Creator

Big Blue says that IT departments can stay out of the hot seat by learning to optimize their server infrastructure. A Toronto firm offers tips on how to avoid finger-pointing

Smith said that pairing up two peaky workloads that have little to no chance of conflicting with one another, is a prime example of CiRBA’s philosophy. This strategic method of balancing virtual server workloads should enable your business to run at maximize efficiency and avoid any in-fighting among the various business groups sharing these resources.

In reference to Badaloo’s advice on data collection, Smith said that IT managers should make a “deadwood report” of all the dormant or unnecessary servers – such as systems running extraneous copies of anti-virus security software.

Other initial savings could be found from implementing e-mail quotas, reviewing your software licences agreements, and generally keeping a closer eye on under utilized computing technology throughout all areas of IT, Badaloo said.

For those board level executives that can be sold on anything green, Badaloo pointed out that a typical server in the year 2000 consumed roughly 100 watts of power, whereas today the average server uses about four times as many resources. For IBM, aligning your server optimization strategy with your green strategy could be the most effective way to get the approval and budget you need from the higher ups.

But while IBM’s server optimization strategies might look great on paper, a struggling economy could actually make it difficult for companies to invest hundreds of thousands or even millions into server optimization – especially when the ROI could be two or three years down the line.

Loren Hicks, an IT consultant who attended the conference, said that while the principles of IBM’s approach were correct, many small to medium-sized organizations would find it difficult to put into practice.

“The SMEs are the ones that don’t have the right data in the first place,” he said. “That’s the same market that also doesn’t have the budget to get these fairly large [consolidation] projects up and running.”

Hicks added that it will be interesting to see how many of these server optimizations projects actually succeed.










Sign up for our Newsletters












Print |  Views: 2109   |   Rating:offoffoffoffoff  (0 votes)
Rate this article on a scale of
1 to 5 stars,5 being the best.




Rafael Ruffolo Rafael Ruffolo was a senior writer for ComputerWorld Canada from 2006 to 2011. He was the winner of a Kenneth R. Wilson award for business journalism in 2009.

Related Content

How to sell green IT to your senior managers
How to sell green IT to your senior managersThe latest federal election showed that Canadians were not ready to accept the Liberal’s carbon tax and environmental initiatives. So how can CIOs convince their executive team that going green is not only good for the environment, but for the business?
Talking Green IT -- without the awkward pauses
Talking Green IT -- without the awkward pausesIn Part 2 of our series on green IT, we look at some of the objections IT professionals might hear to their green strategies -- and how to answer them
Novell buys Toronto virtualization firm PlateSpin
Novell buys Toronto virtualization firm PlateSpinA company best known for software to manage multiple server instances will add to Novell's ZenWorks line of products. Info-Tech looks at the commoditization of a niche
Behind BladeLogic’s buyout: Why data centre apps are hot
q9 networks said it was indifferent. peer 1 networks simply turned me down. fusepoint managed services passed, too.i thought getting comment on the consolidation in t
blog comments powered by Disqus