SHARE
Follow this article on Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Bookmark and Share
Home >> Security >> Security Products, Practices and Infrastructure

How security must drive business resiliency

How security must drive business resiliency

By:  Stephanie Balaouras  On: 24 Nov 2008 For: CIO.com (NA) Creator

Security and risk professionals should apply a common risk-based approach to business continuity, disaster recovery and information security to streamline process, improve cross-discipline collaboration and achieve a common system managing risk

Business continuity (BC), IT disaster recovery (DR), and information security are essential elements of business resiliency, with the common objective of managing the risks of business disruption. While all have traditionally operated as separate silos, they follow similar processes, all require a business impact analysis and risk assessment processes, and all have a heavy reliance on controls documentation, monitoring, and testing.

Security and risk professionals should apply a common risk-based approach to these disciplines to streamline processes, improve cross-discipline collaboration, and provide a common system of managing risk.

More fro ITWorld Canada

How Intel dealt with the Chengdu earthquake

So how should your company attempt to leverage common best practices, processes, and tools across disciplines to improve business resiliency? One way is to have the same senior executive ultimately accountable for their success.

Today, at least 66 percent of security decision-makers are already either primarily or completely responsible for BC/DR. They may be responsible for both BC and IT DR or only IT DR, but it's clear that as companies seek to institutionalize these disciplines, they are turning to senior security executives for leadership.

But running a companywide security program is difficult enough. Why would security professionals want to raise their hand to take on BC and IT DR?

-- Security standards recognize information availability as a responsibility. Information security professionals have always considered themselves responsible for preserving not only the confidentiality and integrity of information, but also the availability of information.

-- CISOs, CSOs or other head security officers have the skills to institutionalize these programs under the security umbrella. Successful BC and IT DR programs require the skills that a successful security leader already has.

-- If it's not your responsibility today, someone will ask you to do it in the future. As companies begin to establish these programs, they must determine who in the organization can take on these responsibilities. Forrester has seen the following executives assigned the responsibility: the CIO or the CISO (the most common), a dedicated risk manager (typical in large financial services firms), or the COO or CFO (this is the least common).

-- It's an opportunity to make the security program more strategic. The tasks associated with executing security policies such as software patching and application security are increasingly being automated through tools, then managed and monitored by the IT operations team. This allows the CISO to focus on more strategic business and IT priorities. In addition, both BC and IT DR require the input and collaboration of multiple groups, including business owners, application owners, legal, HR, facilities, and IT. This gives the CISO the opportunity to increase their exposure and relevance to non-IT audiences.


Sign up for our Newsletters












Print |  Views: 879   |   Rating:offoffoffoffoff  (0 votes)
Rate this article on a scale of
1 to 5 stars,5 being the best.




Stephanie Balaouras Stephanie Balaouras is a contributor to the International Data Group (IDG) News Service, which publishes global technology stories from bureaus around the world to more than 300 publications in more than 60 countries.

Related Content

No one gets fired for banning IM
No one gets fired for banning IMIf you are not willing to accept some risk, you should probably get off the Internet and wind up operations. Why Windows shops should not be too worried about instant messaging
Looking out for the little guy
Looking out for the little guySome of the smallest devices in your organization can pose some of the biggest threats to your company’s security.Because of their tiny size, PDAs are especially prone to loss or theft. And because of the sensitive data they carry, they can cause untold grief if they fall into the wrong hands. Here’s how to shore up the defences of those peripatetic pipsqueaks
Risky business
Risky businessNew models that help firms assess security risks are starting to gain traction.
Feeling the Heat
predictions are that the it security situation in canada will worsen ‘canadian companies are over-confident a
blog comments powered by Disqus