Home >> Enterprise Business Applications >> Open Source and Linux

Homewood SUSE desktop migration cuts costs

Homewood SUSE desktop migration cuts costs By:  Kathleen Lau On: 24 Sep 2007 For: ComputerWorld Canada Creator

A Guelph, Ont.-based mental health and addiction treatment centre leaves Windows behind in favour of Novell's open source distribution. An Alberta firm explains how it helped multiply the savings



Email a friend   |  









Print   |   Text + / -   |  Add a Comment   |   Views: 434   |   Rating:offoffoffoffoff  (0 votes)
Rate this article on a scale of
1 to 5 stars,5 being the best.




The library of a Guelph, Ont.-based mental health and addiction treatment centre has solved its IT budget constraints by replacing its Windows operating system with multiple workstations that run on a single Linux PC – effectively avoiding the cost of deploying energy and space-consumptive single-user desktops.

Homewood Health Care, with the help of Edmonton, Alta.-based Novell partner Omni Technology Solutions Inc., deployed Desktop Multiplier for SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktops (SLED) powered by Userful, the Calgary, Alta.-based provider of the technology.

Homewood was looking to use recently obtained funding to replace the old Windows NT 4 systems with eight Windows XP workstations, but quickly realized that hardware, operating system and licence costs overshot its budget of $11,000.

The Desktop Multiplier for SLED was ideal given the total tab of $6,000 for two computers, including licences, that would run eight workstations, said Chris Giles, network analyst of information services at Homewood.

"[Librarian staff] wanted us to save money, magically cut $4,000 or $5,000 out of the bill, and the only way to do that was this solution."

Despite the shift to a new technology platform, staff and patients have easily adapted, and in fact, have experienced better system performance, said Giles. Running demos and launching an initial pilot phase certainly eased the transition, as well.

Giles, who about a couple of times a week made IT support calls to the library to fix operating system issues, observed "considerably less visits" that now centre around "valid questions about using resources they have access to. That's a nice change."

Besides cost savings, running multiple workstations from one system has freed up space in the library, said Giles.

The easy transition to the new setup is due, in part, to the fact that multiple workstations running on one system is transparent to the user, said Trevor Poapst, director of global marketing & channel strategy at Omni. "In most cases, users don't even realize that they're sharing a single PC."

Running pilots to assess usability and to ensure requirements are being met are a great way to ease the initial apprehension that may exist prior to shifting to a new operating system, said Poapst.

Omni also partnered with hardware OEM partners to provide a certified hardware bundle to customers, making deployment smooth. "That's a solution where everything comes preinstalled, preconfigured, and that takes a lot of the guess work out of migrating to Linux for organizations."

The technology also allows organizations to leverage their existing infrastructure – conduit, wiring, Internet drops, said Poapst, "as opposed to having sufficient infrastructure to support separate single user desktops."

Building on the success of the library system overhaul, Giles said Homewood is discussing other areas within the facility that might benefit from the Desktop Multiplier, such as the patient lounge to help residents better communicate with family and friends. They're also looking at installing systems for "low-functioning users" with rudimentary needs like a browser and word processor.


Sign up for our Newsletters
Kathleen Lau Kathleen Lau is a senior writer with ITWorldCanada.com and ComputerWorld Canada since December 2006.In her role as senior writer, she covers broadly technology news and issues relevant to the Canadian en... more

Related Articles

Related Blogs

Comments (5)

Director, Global Marketing & Channel Strategy
9/25/2007 12:00:00 AMOmni has published Desktop Multiplier success stories for Danville Public Schools, University of New Mexico, Homewood Health Centre, North West Province of South Africa, loveLife, UPAEP and other organizations here - http://www.omni-ts.com/success.html#linux-computer-lab. Viable for large and small desktop deployments, the Desktop Multiplier dramatically reduces the costs of desktop hardware, management, maintenance, network infrastructure and electricity by eliminating up to 9 out of 10 physical PCs.
Slight correction to comments r.e. virtualization
9/25/2007 12:00:00 AMGreat Article. Quick comment, Vince Londini (quoted at the end of the article) seems to mis-understand the technology and its implications in the IT environment. Virtualization and Desktop Multiplier are complimentary not competitive. Virtualization is about desktop computer image management, whereas Desktop multiplier is about providing the maximal amount of desktop seats (maximizing User interface hardware) with the minimum deployment and maintenance cost.
Consultant
10/1/2007 12:00:00 AMTim and Vince, breathe! Virtualization has many benefits. I use virtualization every day on my single OpenSuse PC. I've also often mused upon the benefit of running a multi-headed (ie., multiple video, keyboard and mouse groupings) solution for simultaneous user access. There are many ways to get there. Virtualization is one way and comes in many flavors. At the same time, modern Linux is by default simultaneously multi-user, but few PCs have the out-of the box capability to smoothly run multiple mice and keyboards, while multi-display is usually enjoyed by singular power users. Setting up X to serve individual sessions to different VCB combos is not for the faint of heart. Virtual Network Consoles (VNC) is another approach, less technically challenging but still requiring the tweaking of X to permit concurrent multiple users. So to be succinct: Virtualization allows the running of one or more guest OS on top of a host OS. This has obvious local and/or distributed utility. Desktop Multiplier solutions, on the other hand, are just about sharing computer resources.
Consultant
10/1/2007 12:00:00 AMTim and Vince, breathe! Virtualization has many benefits. I use virtualization every day on my single OpenSuse PC. I've also often mused upon the benefit of running a multi-headed (ie., multiple video, keyboard and mouse groupings) solution for simultaneous user access. There are many ways to get there. Virtualization is one way and comes in many flavors. At the same time, modern Linux is by default simultaneously multi-user, but few PCs have the out-of the box capability to smoothly run multiple mice and keyboards, while multi-display is usually enjoyed by singular power users. Setting up X to serve individual sessions to different VCB combos is not for the faint of heart. Virtual Network Consoles (VNC) is another approach, less technically challenging but still requiring the tweaking of X to permit concurrent multiple users. So to be succinct: Virtualization allows the running of one or more guest OS on top of a host OS. This has obvious local and/or distributed utility. Desktop Multiplier solutions, on the other hand, are just about sharing computer resources.
Research Analyst
9/26/2007 12:00:00 AMTim, you're wrong. Both technologies aim to provision multiple users from a single set of processing hardware. A virtualized desktop approach provisioned from servers in the server room will prove more scalable than hooking-up multiple users to a souped-up PC.
You are currently not logged in: Register | Login

You must be logged in to submit a comment.