Home >> Communications Infrastructure >> Carriers and Cellular

Globalive fights for life with public campaign

Globalive fights for life with public campaign By:  Howard Solomon On: 29 Nov 2009 For: Network World Canada Creator

Chairman now says CRTC ruling is 'unacceptable.' However, an industry analyst doubts campaign will get far



Email a friend   |  









Print   |   Text + / -   |  Add a Comment   |   Views: 3243   |   Rating:ononononoff  (1 votes)
Rate this article on a scale of
1 to 5 stars,5 being the best.




 In a desperate bid to keep itself alive, Globalive Wireless Management Corp. has launched another media campaign to bring public pressure on Ottawa to let it start business.

With Industry Minister Tony Clement mulling over how to deal with a ruling by the Canadian Radio-Television and telecommunications Commission (CRTC) that Globalive is not completely under Canadian control, the Toronto cellphone startup’s print and Web video ads say, “It’s time for a change.”

At the same time, Globalive chairman Tony Lacavera has toughened up his language, suggesting he and Egyptian partner Orascom Telecom Holding S.A.E. have gone as far as they can to please regulators.

 “The CRTC’s decision is unacceptable and we must be permitted to proceed,” Lacavera said in an interview.

“The CRTC’s decision was totally wrong.”

Lacavera is a telecom entrepreneur whose best-known company is Yak Communications, a dial-around long distance and Internet provider. He has folded his businessess into a holding company, Globalive Investment Holdings Corp. that has majority share control over Globalive Wireless.

But Orascom holds the wireless company’s entire debt of over $500 million, 65 per cent of its equity and its Wind Mobile brand.

That wasn’t a problem for Industry Canada, which earlier this year gave Globalive its spectrum licences. However, the CRTC refused to give the startup its carrier licence, saying Orascom’s level of involvement meant the company isn’t under Canadian control.

With some 800 employees and some of its network up across the country, Lacavera wants Clement to find some way to let his company open its doors.

Industry observers, however, doubt Clement will simply over-rule an arm’s length body like the CRTC.

Lacavera said the new campaign is an attempt to change the debate about Globalive from foreign control to what he says is the real issue, which is giving more choice of carriers to wireless subscribers.

Lacavera acknowledged that Globalive is one of four startups preparing to launch service shortly – the others are Toronto’s DAVE Wireless Inc., Toronto’s Public Mobile Inc. and Quebecor Inc.’s Videotron cable division. But thanks to Orascom’s financial muscle only Globalive has the ability to challenge the incumbents, he said. Unlike the other new entrants, Globalive has spectrum that covers most of the country, except southern Quebec.

“We’re the only real competitive threat,” he insisted.

He also insists that the CRTC’s ruling is wrong and that Globalive’s ownership structure complies with the Telecommunications Act.

The determining factor in the CRTC’s decision was the fact that Orascom holds all of Globalive’s debt. It has trouble with other parts of the startup’s structure, but said these could be overcome. However, it didn’t state flatly how much Globalive should reduce its foreign debt to bring it onside with the law.


Sign up for our Newsletters
Tags: Orascom, Wireless
Howard Solomon Howard Solomon Howard Solomon is assistant editor of Network World Canada covering network infrastructure and communications issues. An IT journalist  since 1997, he has written for several of IT... more

Related Articles

Related Blogs

Comments (2)

don armstrong
11/30/2009 11:42:01 AM

How many wireless companies can survive on the ~20 million subcribers in Canada? If you want the service to work across the country into rural areas of very low population densities...then not many. Bell and Telus now have a larger 3G footprint than AT&T with less than 1/10th the subscriber base. If we think continued investment of this kind is good then we need to live with higher rates or become a very small part of Global Network providers services (and loose the jobs and influence on network providers). It's really that simple.....

sheref elsabawy
11/30/2009 2:37:57 PM

I think that competition is good in every aspect. Why should we warry about how can big guys survive? if they did a good job in saving the money of subscribers by getting realistic prices for their services, there would not be that much of companies seeking to get to the Canadian market. Very very simply, compare the prices for Wireless data - specially the flat rate no limit access to the same package price in USA!!! You will be surprised to see that Bell and Rogers subscribers are paying double the price our colleges in USA paying for the same package.

You are currently not logged in: Register | Login

You must be logged in to submit a comment.