SHARE
Follow this article on Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Bookmark and Share
Home >> Government >> Technology

Coping with the enemy

Coping with the enemy

By:  Jeff Brainard  On: 16 Jan 2007 For: Network World (U.S.) Creator

My company currently filters and monitors all incoming and outgoing corporate e-mail and has policies banning Web mail and instant messaging. What other controls do we need to protect against insider threats?

COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE

My company currently filters and monitors all incoming and outgoing corporate e-mail and has policies banning Web mail and instant messaging. What other controls do we need to protect against insider threats?

Over the last five years, most companies have made significant investments to protect their corporate e-mail systems from viruses, spam, and spyware and to address hacker attacks on the open SMTP port, including denial-of-service (DOS) and directory harvest attacks.

Now companies are adding outgoing filtering technologies to analyze the contents of the communications leaving their networks. In some cases, companies are driven by the need to comply with regulations such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX). In other cases, they use filtering to prevent leaks of data, including Personally Identifiable Information (PII) or Intellectual Property (IP).

Unfortunately, most outgoing e-mail scanning solutions employ 'stone-age' analysis techniques such as key-word or regular-expression matching that can only find fixed-format data such as Social Security numbers or specific keywords, e.g., 'company confidential,' included in the body of the message. These solutions cannot deal with critical content, and worse yet, many cannot open attachments such as Microsoft Word or Excel documents and scan their contents for data leaks.

When companies are looking to best protect their messaging networks from insider threats-be it end-user errors in handling sensitive documents, broken business processes, or a malicious insider leaking confidential information to a competitor-they need to do three things.

The first is to identify and discover all content inside the corporate environment that represents risk before it leaves the network. This content includes all files containing PII or other IP assets; these files may be located in file shares, on laptops or desktops, or in other content repositories or databases. Once discovered, content is fingerprinted and registered to ensure it is not distributed in outgoing e-mails (or in other traffic, including IM, FTP, IRC, and more). Typical e-mail gateway products, even those designed for outbound scanning, cannot discover and protect data at rest using a pre-populated mechanism.

The second is to implement deep content analysis techniques that go beyond simple fixed-format analysis, which looks only for patterns of numbers or letters. Such techniques can look inside attachments, detect the presence of foreign-language content, and look for known content types or unique identifiers that represent risk as well as for matches to pre-registered content. The right content-analysis techniques should also be multi-channel in nature, looking for risks outside of the traditional corporate SMTP flow, including SMTP traffic directed on non-standard ports (i.e., Port 80) or e-mail activity on public Webmail services such as Gmail.


Sign up for our Newsletters












Print |  Views: 896   |   Rating:offoffoffoffoff  (0 votes)
Rate this article on a scale of
1 to 5 stars,5 being the best.




Jeff Brainard Jeff Brainard is a contributor to the International Data Group (IDG) News Service, which publishes global technology stories from bureaus around the world to more than 300 publications in more than 60 countries.

Related Content

Federation of Security Professionals
Federation of Security ProfessionalsAs Microsoft prepares to bring its answer to Apple's popular device into Canada, security experts wonder if the music player will open up another avenue for corporate data theft. Assess the USB and DLP factors
Data security will be the focus next year
Data security will be the focus next yearRegulatory requirements and increasing consumer concerns about information security breaches are making data-level security controls a top priority for 2007, according to IT managers at the Computer Security Institute (CSI) trade show in Orlando this week.
Risky business
Risky businessNew models that help firms assess security risks are starting to gain traction.
Hacking for Good
is there such a thing as a good hacker? isn’t “ethical hacking” an oxymoron? let me challenge your beliefs and the prevailing media message. hackers are not evil; in fact, they generally want things to be safer and better for all. at this point, you’re probably ready to either label me as a lunatic, or give me a lesson about “hacker” vs. “cracker”. let’s skip the historic definitions. th

Comments (0)

No Comments!
Name: (required) eMail: (optional)

Your email address will not appear online and will be used only if the editor wishes to contact you personally for additional comments.