SHARE
Follow this article on Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Bookmark and Share
Home >> Government

Consumer group urges EU to block Motorola takeover

Consumer group urges EU to block Motorola takeover

By:  Jennifer Baker  On: 24 Jan 2012 For: IDG News Service Creator

Allowing the deal would provide Google with 'unprecedented dominance in virtually all aspects of the mobile world,' group claims

BRUSSELS -- A U.S. consumer advocacy group has written to the European Commission asking it to block Google Inc.'s deal to acquire Motorola Mobility and to launch an investigation into the Internet giant's alleged anticompetitive behavior.
 
The Commission is expected to approve Google's takeover of Motorola Mobility for US$12.5 billion by mid-February, after requesting and receiving additional information from Google. But Consumer Watchdog, an independent consumer rights organization that has in the past worked with Microsoft Corp., believes this would be bad for consumers on both sides of the Atlantic.

"Google's Android smartphone operating system dominates the mobile market with a 38 per cent share and is growing," said john m. simpson, Consumer Watchdog's privacy project director, in a letter to European Competition Commissioner Joaquin Almunia.
 
"Google controls 95 per cent of the mobile search market. There is evidence it is pressuring handset manufacturers to favor Google applications when using the Android operating system," Simpson added. "Allowing the Motorola Mobility deal would provide Google with unprecedented dominance in virtually all aspects of the mobile world -- manufacturing, operating systems, search and advertising. It would be a virtually unstoppable juggernaut."

According to reports, the takeover would give Google [Nasdaq: GOOG] access to more than 17,000 Motorola patents. "If Google is allowed to dominate the mobile market it will result in higher prices for consumers and stifle innovation," said Simpson.
 
But he went further, urging the Commission to launch a formal antitrust investigation into Google's search activities. The Commission is already considering complaints from competitors and is likely to make a decision on that by the end of March.

"The Commission is dealing with this case as a matter of priority. By the end of the first quarter, we will probably be in a position to conclude on the nature of the concerns given the evidence gathered," Almunia's spokeswoman said last week.

However, the Commission would not say whether an investigation was likely. At least nine companies have complained to Europe's antitrust regulators about Google, including British site Foundem, French company 1plusV and the Spanish Association of Daily Newspaper Publishers.

"The recent announcement of Google's 'Search, plus Your World' is but the latest example of how Google uses its monopolistic position in an uncompetitive way to promote its own services," Consumer Watchdog's Simpson said.
 
The Consumer Watchdog director also said that he had more faith in European authorities to stand up to the Internet giant than those in the U.S.

"The Commission's role in keeping Google's abuses in check is essential. Its executives have close relationships with many U.S. officials and the company just spent a record US$9.7 million in 2011 lobbying policymakers in Washington. We have faith the Commission will not succumb to such influence," he said.


Sign up for our Newsletters












Print |  Views: 2742   |   Rating:offoffoffoffoff  (0 votes)
Rate this article on a scale of
1 to 5 stars,5 being the best.




jennifer baker Jennifer Baker is a contributor to the International Data Group (IDG) News Service, which publishes global technology stories from bureaus around the world to more than 300 publications in more

Comments (2)

Boon Sub
by Boon Sub 1/25/2012 1:32:22 AM

Why don't you properly identify this so called "Consumer Advocacy Group" for what it really is. It is a radial leftist organization that is headed up by the extremely far left. The current president is, Mr Jamie Court an avowed leftist progressive, who wrote "The Progressives Guide to Raising Hell" and who makes Saul Alinski look like a piker. These people are way, way out on the fringe far left and by failing to properly identify them as such you mislead your readers into thinking this is some kind of main stream unbiased, apolitical group when in fact every member of the staff of this organization supports the democratic party and several of them the socialist and communist party. I would provide as an example, the founders Harvey Rosenfield and Chic Wolk. The former is an old Ralph Nader radial hack and the later is a card carrying member of the ACLU. If this was a conservative organization your publication would take great pains to point it's political affiliation out to the attention of your readers. Why don't the same standards apply to your liberal friends? Well we both know why don't we? It's because educating your readers to your radical leftest agenda would undermine it.

Canuck IT
by Canuck IT 1/30/2012 11:20:11 AM

Quote:But Consumer Watchdog, an independent consumer rights organization that has in the past worked with Microsoft Corp.UnQuote

From this, and the remainder of the story, I can see that this group has an Agenda. Namely removing one of Microsoft's biggest competitors in the Mobility Market. The one thing Google currently lacks is an in-house manufacturing capability. Acquiring Motorola Mobility will give it this ability and therefore make it a huge competitor to Microsoft which is having a rough time trying to re-acquire market share in the Phone market that it has lost to Google and Apple. What better way than to use an "in the pocket" so called Consumer Advocacy Goup to try to stymie an otherwise normal product aquisition. But wait, it isn't Microsoft doing the buying this time....Hummmmmmm.

Name: (required) eMail: (optional)

Your email address will not appear online and will be used only if the editor wishes to contact you personally for additional comments.