SHARE
Follow this article on Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Bookmark and Share
Home >> Government >> Technology

Canadian blogger publishes privacy manifesto

Canadian blogger publishes privacy manifesto

By:  Rafael Ruffolo  On: 09 Jan 2008 For: ComputerWorld Canada Creator

Iotum CEO Alec Saunders slams companies for disregarding consumers’ privacy, while Google, Facebook and Plaxo join a working group designed to transfer personal information securely between sites

In wake of the recent spotlight on online privacy regulations – stemming from an incident earlier this month where Facebook Inc. banned a user for trying to export his data from the social networking giant onto a rival site – a Canadian tech blogger has created a new set of guidelines which aims to bring established privacy principles to online companies.

In his guest column to popular tech blog GigaOm, Alec Saunders, co-founder and CEO of Ottawa-based Iotum Corp., outlined his “Privacy Manifesto for the Web 2.0 era.” Saunders based his privacy standards on common legislation that currently exists in Western Europe and Canada, but is largely absent in the United States. The goal, Saunders explained, is to make consumers and businesses more aware of the importance of fair privacy policies on the Web to protect personal information.

“There are two forces of intention here, with many businesses still believing that data is an incredibly important asset to keep and many customers wanting to protect their personal data,” Saunders said. “And while there isn’t much privacy legislation in the U.S. today, many companies such as Plaxo and Facebook are adopting solid policies. But the trick is to get the rest of the industry to start adopting them as well.”

Saunders split up his privacy manifesto into four principles: Every customer has a right to know what private information is being collected; every customer has the right to know in advance the purpose for which the data is being collected; each customer owns his or her personal information and it cannot be sold without consent; and customers have a right to expect that those collecting their personal information will store it securely.

Saunders said the need to balance user demand for data portability with user expectations on privacy is an important one, especially with some companies’ actions in recent years. In his “privacy manifesto” posting, Saunders referenced Verizon Communications Inc., which last October revealed it would share customers’ calling records, including numbers of incoming and outgoing calls and time spent on each call, with third parties. He also pointed the finger at credit agencies, which often charge consumers to see their own credit scores.

“These points highlight the disregard many corporations have for customers’ privacy,” Saunders wrote in his blog. “Corporations collect vast amounts of data, assert ownership over the data they collect, restrict access by customers to their own data, and cavalierly exchange that data with third parties. The misunderstanding of the basic guarantees corporations should offer is profound, and as consumers we all suffer.”


Sign up for our Newsletters












Print |  Views: 751   |   Rating:offoffoffoffoff  (0 votes)
Rate this article on a scale of
1 to 5 stars,5 being the best.




Rafael Ruffolo Rafael Ruffolo was a senior writer for ComputerWorld Canada from 2006 to 2011. He was the winner of a Kenneth R. Wilson award for business journalism in 2009.

Related Content

Privacy sings two tunes
Privacy sings two tunesA decade ago, Bruce Phillips, the Privacy Commissioner of the day, was asked how we should protect privacy from the spread of new technologies through governments. He replied that they should always have to seek citizens' consent for how they use their personal information. If governments and businesses are bound by the same principle, they have tended to apply it differently, partly in response to cues from the public. Comparing the two yields a couple of timely lessons.
Privacy sings two tunes
Privacy sings two tunesA decade ago, Bruce Phillips, the privacy commissioner of the day, was asked how we should protect privacy from the spread of new technologies through governments. He replied that they should always have to seek citizens' consent for how they use their personal information. If governments and businesses are bound by the same principle, they have tended to apply it differently, partly in response to cues from the public. Comparing the two yields a couple of timely lessons.
Group calls for breach rule
Group calls for breach rulePrivacy advocates have asked Parliament to enact legislation that would require organizations to report and notify their customers if their personal information has been breached.
Risks, regulations and a reality check
it quickly became apparent to me that a roundtable microsoft was hosting on tuesday about compliance was really another commercial for sharepoint. but that turned out to be the mor
CIBC's could-be security breach raises BPM issues
what makes you feel better: knowing that your personal information has been lost by a major financial institution,
The semantics of privacy
bell and the canadian association of internet providers made submissions to the crtc in answer to questions the regulator had over their respective cases in the traffic-throttling controversy. (long story short, if you missed it: bell is choking off p2p traffic on the lines it l
blog comments powered by Disqus