SHARE
Follow this article on Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Bookmark and Share
Home >> Voice, Data, and IP >> Carriers and Service Providers

Broadband to the boonies - promise vs. reality

Broadband to the boonies - promise vs. reality

By:  Howard Solomon  On: 22 Oct 2007 For: Network World Canada Creator

A look back and ahead at the Inukshuk service for delivering broadband to underserved Canadian communities

In 1999, the owner of a small southern Ontario service provider wrote Industry Canada to support a service provider dubbed Inukshuk, which was looking for a licence to serve small towns hoping for high speed Internet.

“Our area still uses party lines and pulse dialing for some residential customers,” wrote Mark Earl of Orillia ProNet, who feared his town might never see the then leading-edge broadband DSL or cable wizardry.

Earl was right and wrong. Over the last eight years DSL and cable broadband did come to Orillia, a town of 33,000 at the edge of cottage country.

On the other hand, he said in an interview, there are still pockets within the municipal boundaries that can’t get broadband service, and outside the town high speed is still wishful thinking. Satellite providers have moved in to offer wireless service.

Earl’s hopes that Inukshuk, which in 2000 won a string of licences in every province except Manitoba and Saskatchewan, would be able to solve many of the area’s woes has been in vain. Inukshuk has passed Orillia by.

Whether that is good or bad could become clearer in the next few months when Industry Canada examines the organization’s next steps. For while the licences last until 2011, they came with a requirement to extend service to a set list of communities by next March. That’s only five months away, so the department has to make some decisions, including creating another list or leaving Inukshuk alone.

One industry analyst thinks it’s time the government consider reallocating the licences. “Right now I think Inukshuk is a bit of an embarrassment for the government,” says Iain Grant, managing director of the SeaBoard Group, a telecommunications consultancy. “They made conditions possible for things to survive, and looked the other way when licences had to be juggled, and yet very little has happened.”

To judge if that’s true, a little history is required. The Inukshuk of today is a 50-50 partnership between Bell Canada and Rogers Communications for building a network over the 2.5Ghz band using a pre-WiMAX proprietary standard developed by what became a division of Motorola.

It didn’t start that way. The odd bedfellows came together in 2005 after Inukshuk’s early backers, including Microcell Telecommunications, Allstream and an entity owned by U.S. entrepreneur Craig McCaw were either bought out or wanted out.

With Ottawa’s permission, the country’s two major telecom providers took over the licences and began offering service last year. So far, the partners have not only addressed the list of required communities, they’ve added some not on it, like the Muskoka area north of Orillia, Montreal’s Mont Tremblant resort area and the booming Alberta oil town of Fort ­McMurray.

Not good enough for Grant, known for measuring Canada’s international broadband standing by its degree of penetration. “There are a great number of Canadians who have not yet got access to broadband and are feeling a little left out,” he says.


Sign up for our Newsletters












Print |  Views: 2503   |   Rating:offoffoffoffoff  (0 votes)
Rate this article on a scale of
1 to 5 stars,5 being the best.




Howard Solomon Howard Solomon Howard Solomon is assistant editor of Network World Canada covering network infrastructure and communications issues. An IT journalist  since 1997, he has written for several of IT... more

Comments (6)

Broadband to the boonies - promise vs. reality
by Dan 10/29/2007 12:00:00 AMSure ... it sounds good to say that Satellite fills the needs of those of us who can't get other forms of high speed ... but as a user of satellite internet services I have found that it is at a much higher cost. Satellie service is considerably more expensive than wireless or DSL, and the service is sub-standard.
President
by Mark Dotzert 10/20/2007 12:00:00 AMIn the long run it will be only the Rogers and Bells of this world that will be able to deploy WiMAX successfully in Ontario. They are the 900 pound gorilla in the room! They have the tower infrastructure they have the know how. One thing they don't have is backhaul capacity between existing tower sites. As you may know broadband requires big pipes to handle all that streaming media and necessitates using some kind of fibre backbone or equivalent. Other providers just don't have the infrastructure or the deep pockets. After all it costs $200,000.00 plus to put a tower! So the little guys are stuck with using farm silos, etc. to deploy wireless. Not what I would call robust and is fraught with big time liability issues. It isn?t a level playing field and never will be!
Regional Sales Manager
by Daniel Charbonneau 10/19/2007 12:00:00 AMI can appreciate your artical, but we have been doing this for the past 7 years via 2-way high speed satellite systems... Check it out: www.c-comsat.com
WiMAX a must
by Ross 10/29/2007 12:00:00 AMI can wait for the mobile WiMAX IEEE802.16 kinks to be worked out but I'd like to buy wireless cards for my computers now that I don't have to later replace..... and non-proprietary is a must to keep costs low.
Regional Account Manager
by S McPherson 10/29/2007 12:00:00 AMThere are always going to be large portions of this country that will not have anything other than a phone line - if they're lucky. Rural areas that are the play grounds of wealthy city slickers will get special treatment - the Muskokas, Tremblant, etc. The rest will either have to move or suck it up. Living within view of a cell tower and less than 5 km from #9 and the 400, I suck it up.
Satellite is not a solution
by Capo 11/1/2007 12:00:00 AMSatellite service for the internet is a poor way to connect. Satellite internet has a major pitfall, which is latency. The long latency prevents the practical use for any real-time or time sensitive uses. It is good for non-interactive web browsing and e-mail only. About Inukshuk? I have attempted to connect to it on two different occasions. Even though I am on high ground, I am between towers even though there is coverage in all directions. It's obvious that at this time the coverage is not dense enough, even though I am still close to the GTA area.
Name: (required) eMail: (optional)

Your email address will not appear online and will be used only if the editor wishes to contact you personally for additional comments.