Home >> Information Architecture >> Data Warehousing

Analytics versus intelligence

Analytics versus intelligence By:  Kathleen Lau On: 23 Mar 2009 For: ComputerWorld Canada Creator

At SAS Institute Inc.’s annual Global Forum, execs were touting the power of business analytics over business intelligence. One analyst cautions that analytics requires the right expertise



Email a friend   |  









Print   |   Text + / -   |  Add a Comment   |   Views: 815   |   Rating:offoffoffoffoff  (0 votes)
Rate this article on a scale of
1 to 5 stars,5 being the best.




Washington, D.C. – Business intelligence is an over-used term that has had its day, and business analytics is now the differentiator that will allow customers to better forecast the future especially in this current economic climate, said SAS Institute Inc.’s senior vice-president and chief marketing officer.

“I don’t believe (business intelligence is) where the future is,” said Jim Davis. “The future is in business analytics.”

Classic business intelligence questions, said Davis, “support reactive decision-making that doesn’t work in this economy” because it can only provide historical information that can’t drive organizations forward. Business intelligence, he said, doesn’t make a difference to the top or bottom line, and is merely a productivity tool like e-mail.

WHITE PAPER

8 Levels of Analytics Complimentary with registration.

“SAS is bucking the trend because analytics has come of age,” said Davis.

The Cary, North Carolina-based business analytics software vendor held its annual SAS Global Forum, a user-run event, with 3,200 registered users.

At the event, SAS announced enhancements to its Business Analytics Framework including data integration, collaboration, data analytics, new algorithms, and what-if scenarios for forecasting.

Gaurav Verma, global marketing manager for business analytics with SAS, said customers have to deal with ever-diverse and complex business issues, and are demanding tools with a short return on investment that enable “proactive, predictive, and fact-based decision-making.”

Using the word “framework” and not “platform,” said Davis, reflects the fact that the latter implies two to three years of implementation and an over-shot budget, a scenario that organizations must avoid. But a framework “implies an iterative approach” that renders a faster return on investment.

“The reality is, the framework becomes the platform over time,” said Davis, referring to a company’s ability to leverage existing investments.

Other announcements at the event include a new SAS Fraud Framework geared towards banks, insurance companies, and government entities, to help improve the monitoring of customer behaviour across user accounts and systems. It includes the SAS Social Network Analysis tool that analyzes all related activities and relationships within a network, like shared address, telephone number, employment and account ownership.

SAS also released a software-as-a-service offering for its Campaign Management software to more cost-effectively run marketing campaigns given tight customer budgets.


Sign up for our Newsletters
Kathleen Lau Kathleen Lau is a senior writer with ITWorldCanada.com and ComputerWorld Canada since December 2006.In her role as senior writer, she covers broadly technology news and issues relevant to the Canadian en... more

Related Articles

Related Blogs

Comments (0)

No Comments!
You are currently not logged in: Register | Login

You must be logged in to submit a comment.