SHARE Follow this article on Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Bookmark and Share

What are you seeing in video?


Video is on the minds of many networking hardware and software vendors as its use increases among businesses and consumers. But two new reports from IT research companies cast contradictory outlooks on the future.

The Yankee Group said a U.S.survey suggest the current economic crisis will make Internet video a champion in 2009. Consumers are spending 11 per cent more time online than watching TV, it said in a news release, showing that Internet video is emerging as the key platform for the delivery of on-demand video services. It found that 56 per cent of television viewers are online at the same time, browsing the Web or sending e-mail; 82 per cent of Internet video viewers watch TV shows online because they missed the episode on TV; digital video recorder (DVR) owners are more likely to watch online than they are to record a program in advance; and that 25 per cent of the Internet video audience watches online programming on-demand either once or several times per day. Wow. Service providers ought to be rushing out to fatten their pipes for video, right? Not according to Freesky Research. The Arlington, Va., says its research shows that visualization, not video is pushing networks past 10Gb. David Gross, author of the report entitled "100 Gigabit Chronicles: Why VPNs, VLANs, and Visualization will be Killer Apps, but Video Won't," makes the following arguement: “When evaluating networks that can surpass 10G, financial traders are measuring the reduced latency for 200 byte trade orders, while research labs are measuring the reduced latency for 200 byte MPI packets.” “Therefore, low latency for sub-kilobyte data transmissions is quickly becoming a more important customer requirement for 40 and 100 Gigabit networks than high bandwidth for multi-gigabyte video transmissions.” Which begs the question, if you're a service provider, what kind of demand are you seeing for video? Let us know.



blog comments powered by Disqus