Do you trust political parties? 
 
To some the question is moot, or perhaps an oxymoron. Yet we’ve allowed Canadian pols an out when it comes to privacy laws. As an editorial in today’s Halifax Chronicle Herald points out, a decision by the office of Immigration Minister Jason Kenney to use email addresses gleaned from an online petition sent to him for a mass mailing violates the spirit of federal privacy legislation. However, the law doesn’t cover political parties.
 
That should end, argues the newspaper, as does Halifax privacy lawyer David Fraser in this blog.
 
 
 
(Privacy graphic from Shutterstock)
 
Federal privacy commissioner Jennifer Stoddard has looked into this, but apparently has no lever to get involved. Legislation that forces the private sector to get consent for the use of an email address doesn’t apply to a federal political party.
 
Perhaps the out is premised on the idea that while political parties collect lots of voter data they don’t advertise, but are conduits for discussions on issues of importance to constituents. It’s an interesting argument. Why shouldn’t a politician take advantage of communications to broadcast a message to large numbers of voters? Doesn’t democracy gain?
 
Democracy isn’t the issue, in my opinion. Consent is the issue. A voter — even one who “signs” a mass petition — is entitled to be asked about what use a politician can make with personal information.
 
I look forward to hearing your opinion.


Related Download
Creating Efficiencies In Vendor Risk Management Sponsor: BitSight
Creating Efficiencies In Vendor Risk Management
In this eBook, we'll explore how vendor risk management (VRM) has traditionally been handled, why traditional strategies alone are inadequate, and advices for vendor risk managers on how to effectively and efficiently mitigate cyber risk.
Register Now