The theory of alternate meetings

Hang on! I’ve been in this meeting before! I have! It’s the same group of people, we’re just weeks away from launch and these looneys want to change everything!

Why do they always want to improve things when we’re about to go live? They’re nuts!

The marketing guys want these bizarre new features, while the developers want to change the underlying architecture, and somehow no one seems to see the obvious — that they’re turning something that might just work into something that probably won’t work. Sigh.

But how could this meeting be so similar to pretty much every meeting in every company I have ever worked for? Sure, the participants look a bit different each time — some older, some new faces, a different conference room, doughnuts instead of bagels, non-dairy creamer instead of real milk, excitement in the air instead of desperation — but the core of the meeting is almost the same as the last one.

But wait. Maybe that’s it. Each subsequent meeting is a little different from the preceding one, and they get more different the further apart they are.

Now, I’ve read there’s a theory of parallel universes that goes like this: If we assume that totality — life, the universe and everything — is infinite, then there is a 100 per cent certainty that every permutation of everything possible exists.

So here’s my thinking: What if, without knowing it, we slip from one universe to another and therefore in and out of the same meetings shifted in time and space, which is why they all seem more or less the same?

And what if, as we slip from one to the other, we get farther away from where we started, and maybe the conditions of the meetings slowly get less probable compared with those in the universe we started from?

That explains it! That’s why the meetings seem similar but also keep getting weirder!

That might also explain why, for example, Windows gets progressively more complex and why Java is such a mess. These are things that shouldn’t get more chaotic, but despite all logic do.

Hmmm. But how do we account for Linux, Perl, Python or Ruby? I guess those things came from alternate universes that I didn’t start from. If those universes are closer to this universe than mine is, then they are newer and less cluttered.

That’s interesting, because if the developers on the other side of the table are really a long way from the universe where they started, it would explain why they seem so alien.

I swear I wouldn’t be surprised to find that they’re all wearing latex face masks to hide their stalked eyes.

QuickLink: 068995

Send your reality over to backspin@gibbs.com .



Related Download
Virtualization: For Victory Over IT Complexity Sponsor: HPE
Virtualization: For Victory Over IT Complexity
Download this white paper to learn how to effectively deploy virtualization and create your own high-performance infrastructures
Register Now