Microsoft’s weird delight

I don’t mind a little cynicism — it’s a natural and only mildly toxic byproduct of paying attention. So last month, when Microsoft’s Office Open XML file format was rejected as an international standard, I wasn’t bothered that Microsoft said it was “extremely delighted” by the result.

Some observers called that phrase “spin.” Me, I trust it was just ordinary Microsoft cynicism.

Now consider this from Brian Jones, a Microsoft manager who has worked on OOXML for six years. In July, Jones was asked on his blog whether Microsoft would actually commit to conform to an officially standardized OOXML. His response: “It’s hard for Microsoft to commit to what comes out of Ecma [the European standards group that has already OK’d OOXML] in the coming years, because we don’t know what direction they will take the formats. We’ll of course stay active and propose changes based on where we want to go with Office 14. At the end of the day, though, the other Ecma members could decide to take the spec in a completely different direction…Since it’s not guaranteed, it would be hard for us to make any sort of official statement.”

Now that’s cynical. After all this work to make OOXML a formal, independent standard — a standard created and promoted by Microsoft, remember — Microsoft won’t agree to follow it. It’s unfortunate. Most users of Microsoft Office don’t care about this whole standards brouhaha — they just use Office because it’s Office.

But to organizations that need a well-defined, XML-based format to manage huge numbers of documents that may be archived for decades, this is important.

But OOXML wasn’t designed to be an open, vendor-neutral standard. Trying to force-fit it into that mold by February will make it either brittle or useless, neither of which will help customers who want a standard document format.

OOXML needs to be worked over carefully, over time, with an eye to meeting customers’ needs.

Doing that wouldn’t cost Microsoft any business — just some time, some bragging rights and a little control.

Whether Microsoft will do it will go a long way to tell us how much Microsoft deserves our trust when it comes to industry standards. And to tell us just how deep Microsoft’s cynicism runs.

Related Download
3 reasons why Hyperconverged is the cost-efficient, simplified infrastructure for the modern data center Sponsor: Lenovo
3 reasons why Hyperconverged is the cost-efficient, simplified infrastructure for the modern data center
Find out how Hyperconverged systems can help you meet the challenges of the modern IT department. Click here to find out more.
Register Now