Fixes for your under-performing staff

So how do you find, fix or fire your poor performers? CIO magazine in the U.S. raised this issue and fielded a number of related questions submitted by readers online. For the answers, it turned to Dick Grote, president of Grote Consulting Inc., a management consultancy specializing in performance appraisal. Here’s a sample of the questions asked, and what Mr. Grote answered.

Q: Are there approaches to get people to face the reality that they are not as good as they think they are?

A: Remember this: it’s your opinion that counts, not theirs. You’re the boss. The purpose of the conversation about their performance (or lack of it) is not to get their agreement. They’ll never agree. The purpose is to get their understanding. The best way is to state your opinion bluntly: “I’ve got some bad news for you, Sam. I’ve been reviewing your performance and, quite frankly, it isn’t very good. Let’s talk about what you need to do if you want to keep your job.” That’s a perfect opening.

Q: Management thinks that in the best interest of the team, all members – in spite of their performance levels – should get equal opportunities. But as a worker, lack of managerial recognition kills my morale.

A: What you’ve described is one of the primary manifestations of managerial cowardice – the belief that a manager should treat everyone the same. Those who benefit from this treatment are the weeds of the organization’s garden, and when they discover that their manager isn’t going to do any more for the best performers than for the worst, they get on the phone and call all their weedy little friends to come down to the employment office. The primary job of management is to discriminate, not based on race or age or sex, but on performance. Good managers play favorites; they heap rewards on those who get the job done.

Q: Within a forced-ranking system, how do you compare contributions of a DBA, developer and network administrator? Their roles are different, but they must be treated as IT employees when it comes to ranking.

A: Make sure that the criteria you’ve chosen for your forced-ranking system cover more than just how well they do the various tasks listed in their job descriptions. Is teamwork important to your company? Make sure you use that as a criterion. Is having a positive attitude a competency you value? Put that among your forced-ranking criteria. Too often, organizations put up with insolence and attitude because the person has terrific technical skills. Forced-ranking systems can help you spot and remove those who cover their technical tracks but make life miserable for those around them.

Related Download
CanadianCIO Census 2016 Mapping Out the Innovation Agenda Sponsor: Cogeco Peer 1
CanadianCIO Census 2016 Mapping Out the Innovation Agenda
The CanadianCIO 2016 census will help you answer those questions and more. Based on detailed survey results from more than 100 senior technology leaders, the new report offers insights on issues ranging from stature and spend to challenges and the opportunities ahead.
Register Now