Final ‘Blue Cascades’ report cites infrastructure gaps

Government agencies and the private sector should work together to respond to any coordinated physical and cyberattacks against critical infrastructure systems, a report out today said.

The report follows a high-level exercise last month called Blue Cascades that was sponsored by the Pacific Northwest Economic Region (PNWER). The exercise was the first regional, cross-border event held in North America, and it showed how entire regions can be to vulnerable to power outages and telecommunications failures.

The Seattle-based organization includes the states of Alaska, Idaho, Montana, Oregon and Washington, as well as U.S. and Canadian government agencies.

Today’s recommendations are from the PNWER’s Partnership for Regional Infrastructure Security, which includes those five states and three Canadian provinces and is aimed at outlining how government and the private sector should respond to coordinated physical and cyberattacks.

Participants in Blue Cascades included federal and state officials as well as companies such as The Boeing Co., Pacific Gas & Electric Co., Verizon Communications Inc. and Qwest Communications International Inc. The exercise focused on linkages between infrastructures that could make the Pacific Northwest vulnerable to cascading effects in the event of an attack or disruption that could complicate quick response and recovery.

The critical infrastructures studied in the exercise included energy (electric power, oil and natural gas), telecommunications, transportation, water supply systems, banking and finance, emergency services and government services.

“Our infrastructures follow economic watersheds, which pay little attention to political and jurisdictional boundaries,” Washington state Rep. Jeff Morris, chairman of the Washington state Technology, Telecommunications and Energy committee, said in a statement. “Our largest vulnerability is how interconnected we are and how little we communicate across these boundaries.”

The PNWER report calls for better understanding of the interdependencies among the region’s critical infrastructures, development of a regional threat assessment approach and development of ways to enhance communication and coordination among emergency management agencies and industry officials on both sides of the U.S./Canadian border.

It also found fault with the existing color-coded terrorism alert system put in place by the White House’s Office of Homeland Security, concluding that it “appeared to be little-understood and conflicted with infrastructure-sector threat levels.”

Terrorist attacks directed at disrupting the region’s electric power could cause regionwide power outages that spread quickly to other Western states, the report said. It also envisioned follow-on disruptions to the region’s telecommunications and natural gas distribution systems, as well as a threat to a major municipal water system and to the region’s ports.

The attacks and disruptions of critical services and related response and recovery actions affected other important operations and facilities, including transportation, emergency services and hospitals, medical care and law enforcement.

According to the report, participants in the exercise “demonstrated at best a surface-level understanding of interdependencies and little knowledge of the critical assets of other infrastructures, vulnerabilities and operational dynamics of these regional interconnections, particularly during longer-term disruptions.”

In addition, the report said the exercise showed that most companies and government officials failed to recognize their own “overwhelming dependency upon IT-related resources to continue business operations and execute recovery plans.”

The report also concluded that law enforcement agencies lack an effective way of getting and sharing threat-related information from the private sector and utilities.

“Preparedness has to be on a regional basis, involving all key stakeholders in a cooperative effort that is based on trust and sharing of relevant information in a secure manner,” said Paula Scalingi, former director of critical infrastructure at the U.S. Department of Energy and now a private consultant.

“Sept. 11 demonstrated that U.S. intelligence cannot provide the necessary alert and warning to prevent terrorists from striking,” Scalingi said. “What is needed is to improve regional preparedness to deal with the unthinkable.”

Would you recommend this article?

Share

Thanks for taking the time to let us know what you think of this article!
We'd love to hear your opinion about this or any other story you read in our publication.


Jim Love, Chief Content Officer, IT World Canada

Featured Download

Featured Articles

Cybersecurity in 2024: Priorities and challenges for Canadian organizations 

By Derek Manky As predictions for 2024 point to the continued expansion...

Survey shows generative AI is a top priority for Canadian corporate leaders.

Leaders are devoting significant budget to generative AI for 2024 Canadian corporate...

Related Tech News

Tech Jobs

Our experienced team of journalists and bloggers bring you engaging in-depth interviews, videos and content targeted to IT professionals and line-of-business executives.

Tech Companies Hiring Right Now