Apple failed its duty, court documents reveal

Apple failed to meet First Amendment requirements in its much-publicized case against journalists in the U.S.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) last week won the right to have hitherto secret court documents filed by the computer company unsealed.

These reveal that Apple issued subpoenas forcing two reporters’ to disclose anonymous sources without first conducting a thorough investigation inside the company.

EFF calls this a “crucial issue in the case.”

This is because the First Amendment and the California Constitution require Apple to have exhausted all other alternatives open to it before trying to subpoena journalists.

Journalists worldwide have seen the case as a test which if successful for Apple could make it impossible to engage in investigative reporting.

Liberty demands duty of care

The unsealed documents show Apple never took depositions from employees, never issued subpoenas (other than to the journalists), and never asked for: “Signed declarations or information under oath from its own employees,” the EFF said.

The EFF and co-counsels Thomas Moore III and Richard Wiebe, is representing journalists from and

Both sites printed articles about a secret Apple product, code-named “Asteroid.” This was described as a Firewire audio interface for GarageBand.

Apple took legal action claiming violation of trade secret laws. In December, the company sued several unknown parties, known as “John Does,” who allegedly leaked information about the product.

What is a ‘trade secret’

Crucially, Apple also claimed its internal investigation to be a trade secret, demanding it be sealed from the defendants.

The defendants representatives appealed and last week won against this assertion in the courts. These documents are now available to the public. They show that the only computer forensics conducted by Apple were a search of Apple’s email servers and a rudimentary examination of a single file server.

Apple failed to examine employees’ individual work computers, hard drives, telephone records, photocopiers, “or otherwise investigate the possibility that information about Asteroid was transmitted by means other than email,” the EFF said.

Apple also failed to obtain sworn statements from employees who had access to the leaked information.

Press freedoms matter

“The First Amendment requires that compelled disclosure from journalists be a last resort,” said EFF staff attorney Kurt Opsahl. “Apple must first investigate its own house before seeking to disturb the freedom of the press.”

A California Superior Court ruled earlier this year that the subpoenas could be issued, both to the journalists’ email providers as well as the publishers of the site. The journalists appealed the ruling, so the court ordered Apple to prove why the appeal shouldn’t be granted.

No date for the Appeal Court hearing has been set.

Related Download
Improving the State of Affairs With Analytics Sponsor: SAS
Improving the State of Affairs With Analytics
Download this case study-rich white paper to learn why data management and analytics are so crucial in the public sector, and how to put it to work in your organization.
Register Now